Friday, October 1, 2010

R&D Hari Raya Open House

Hi All,

Yesterday, our department successfully organizes R&D Hari Raya Open House.
All R&D staff celebrate this open house with joyful. A lot of variety foods prepare, such as: nasi impit (similar as ketupat),lemang, kuah kacang,rendang ayam,sambal goreng,kuah lodeh,ayam masak merah, mee goreng, spaghetti, fruits, bubur kacang and biskut raya..


If we have time, we will organize again this open house for next year…
Ok.. Enjoy the picture …!!

























post by:farah

Friday, April 23, 2010

Automotive employment, production up, but now steel, power worries surface

By: Irma Venter
19th April 2010
Source : Engineering News


Concerns over steel price increases and availability, as well as the impact of the recent electricity price hikes have emerged in South Africa’s automotive industry, just as it started to show signs of recovery following a global recession which had decimated new vehicle sales last year.

The National Association of Automobile Manufacturers of South Africa (Naamsa) on Monday reported that the country’s car and truck vehicle manufacturers added 1 196 new jobs to their payroll in the first quarter of the year, to reach employment levels of 31 357 people, compared with the 30 161 positions filled at the end of last year.

The association said the increase in head count was attributable to additional recruitment at three of the industry’s major employers.

Domestic vehicle production was expected to rise from 374 000 units in 2009, to 443 000 units in 2010 – an increase of 18,4%.

Vehicle assembly industry capacity utilisation levels had also recuperated to 69,6% for the first quarter of 2010 at passenger car plants, following a 59,4% rate prevalent in 2009. This was, however, still down on 2006‘s 80,1%.

Light commercial vehicle capacity utilisation levels increased to 65,1% from 56,5%, medium commercial vehicle to 69,6% from 64,6%, and heavy trucks to 74,1% from 66,1%.

Naamsa on Monday also revised it vehicle sales projections for 2010 upwards, and now expected the market to grow by around 14% – to 451 500 units – compared with 2009, after forecasting growth of a much more conservative 7% earlier this year.

Naamsa director Nico Vermeulen said that South Africa’s sales growth for the first quarter of 2010 was higher than in the rest of the world.

“By and large, it is a slightly more positive picture for the local industry,” he added.

However, it was not all good news as Naamsa reported that it expected local component pricing to be “significantly impacted” by the Eskom electricity price increase which came into effect on April 1, although it also noted that the magnitude of this remained murky.

The association added that several vehicle and component manufacturers had also raised concern over steel availability and steel pricing implications arising from steelmaker ArcelorMittal South Africa's (AMSA's) dispute with iron-ore supplier Kumba Iron Ore.

Kumba earlier this year ended a deal which allowed AMSA to obtain ore at a discounted rate, stating that it would sell its product to the steelmaker at market rates, as from March 1.

However, AMSA argued that the long-term preferential supply agreement was still valid, but noted that it would need to increase prices by $80/t to ease the impact of the dispute.

“Steel is a big issue – for more than one vehicle manufacturer – as are Eskom’s price increases and the increase in fuel costs,” said Vermeulen. “The combined effect of all of this is undermining the competitiveness of South Africa’s parts and vehicles in international markets, and it creates pressure on the affordability of vehicles in the local market.”
Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter

Friday, April 2, 2010

Department dinner 2010

Hello everyone,

Our department will have dinner on 2nd April 2010. Below is the memo from Mr.Azlan regarding the dinner program..

Dear all R&D members,

This year we are here again under the same roof working as a team. As we know, our management had provide us with staff gathering fund for our department dinner or function. I'm as R&D representative is planning to arrange the dinner program on end of this month. Below is the dinner details:

Date : 2 April 2010 (Friday)
Time : 7.30 - 10.30 pm
Participant : All R&D department member
Guest : Mr. YK Ng (Confirmed)
Location : Refer to Map attached
Venue : Coffee House (Grand Paragon Hotel, JB)
Food style : International Asian Food (Buffet)


p/s: Will upload the picture next day.. !!

Friday, March 19, 2010

Secrets of effective feedback

Source:http://blog.kairospl.com/
February 18, 2010


People become defensive whenever feedback is given. This is because it is not given in the right way. David Lee provides some guidelines for giving feedback below:

So many managers tell me that providing constructive feedback—or at least feedback they hope will be perceived as constructive—is one of their biggest challenges. All too often they avoid giving it, because they know it’s going to be awkward and could possibly make matters worse.

The effects of ineffective feedback
When a manager attempts to give constructive feedback, but does it ineffectively, the employee may:

Feel misunderstood—and therefore hurt and resentful
Feel put down and disrespected
Believe that all the good things he does aren’t noticed or appreciated
Conclude the boss doesn’t know what he’s talking about
Not understand exactly what is expected of him and so may continue to make the same mistakes
Lose his motivation and become less likely to go the extra mile when necessary
How to avoid giving ineffective feedback
The ability to give truly valuable feedback depends not only upon knowing what to do but also what NOT to do.

DO NOT:

1. Sugarcoat negative feedback. When you’re overly concerned about triggering a negative response, it’s natural to try to sugarcoat negative feedback. The result? The employee doesn’t really understand what you’re trying to say or the seriousness of the situation.

2. Back down if the employee becomes upset. While taking a time-out might be the best response when a person truly becomes unglued, revising your assessment downward or deciding “it’s not worth it” are never appropriate responses.

3. Avoid the conversation until you’ve “had it up to here.” When you wait until you are in a frustrated, take-no-prisoners state, not much good is going to come out of the conversation. The employee will likely feel attacked and will become defensive.

4. Use an overly formal or forceful opening. Managers often do this as a way to let the person know they mean business and/or to reduce the odds that the employee will “fight back.” While a formal, all-business demeanor is appropriate for very serious matters, it’s not necessary in many situations. Most people appreciate a more low-key approach that communicates, “We’re two adults here” instead of a “You are about to be scolded by the principal” tone that tends to trigger defensiveness.

5. “Control the airwaves.” Some managers present a monologue instead of encouraging a dialogue, believing this approach will prevent the employee from disagreeing or making excuses. In reality, the manager will trigger resentment and resistance in the employee.

6. State what you’re unhappy about without offering a clear picture of what you want. This approach doesn’t let the employee know what he needs to do to succeed, which leaves him feeling impotent.

7. Present an action plan without first getting agreement about the problem. A plan is meaningless unless the person understands what the issue is, what needs to be changed and why.

8. Give positive feedback without specifics. (e.g. “You’re awesome!”; “You do such a great job!”). This is especially counterproductive for people with personality styles that value data, precision, and detail. These people also tend to dislike flamboyant or emotional language. When they hear undefined and unspecified praise, they question the praise giver’s sincerity and knowledge about what they’re praising.

9. Mistake valid reasons for excuses. Some bosses are so worried about being taken advantage of that they’re unable to recognize valid reasons and extenuating circumstances. To them, everything other than a “You’re right, boss” agreement seems like an excuse. When employees feel that their legitimate points are seen as excuses, they shut out the accuser and become resentful.

10. Wait for annual performance review time to give feedback. This is a great way to spark confused “What are you talking about?” resentment-packed conversations. To be effective, feedback must be ongoing, addressing problems as they arise.

11. Use vague judgments without specific examples. Concepts like “more of a team player,” “more service oriented,” and “more professional” mean nothing. Labels without examples leave people feeling helpless about making changes because they don’t know what specifically you’re unhappy about or what you want.

12. Deliver a long preamble before giving the negative feedback. This just builds suspense for what they know is coming: the negative feedback. (“I really appreciate what a team player you are and I really love your attention to detail and I think you’re doing a great job with …. BUT…”).

13. Use blunt, provocative, or shaming language to make a point. There is no reason to resort to language like: “I would think that would be a no-brainer…”; “That train has left the station, so let’s move on, huh?” and so forth.

14. Pretend to agree and then disagree. “I can see why you feel that way, but…” There’s a difference between honestly acknowledging the other person’s viewpoint and just pretending to agree as a way to soften them up for your opposing point of view. You can acknowledge that you understand their perspective even if you don’t agree with it.

15. Wing it. Few things spark resentment or diminished respect for the critic than the feeling that one is being judged before the critic has thought through the possible angles and has gotten all the facts.

16. Tell someone what’s going on inside his head. You’re a manager, not a psychiatrist. If you have a good relationship with the employee, it’s fine to ask her if your guess about what’s going on is accurate; just don’t imply you know what’s going on inside her head—that’s presumptuous.

17. Use a “one size fits all” approach to praise. Our natural tendency is to praise people the way we like to be praised, but that only works for people who are like us. What works for some personality types doesn’t work for others.

18. Give feedback only when there is a problem. Gallup’s research reveals that 65% of employees say they did not receive any recognition in the previous year. Since positive feedback is a huge motivator, neglecting to give it is a huge mistake. If the only time you give feedback is to say something negative, your employees will automatically respond defensively the moment you try to give them feedback—not the ideal condition for a constructive conversation.

19. Use sarcasm to makec a point. Some humor—used judiciously—can lighten the tone and help diminish the sense of power differential that causes so much awkwardness when a boss gives a subordinate corrective feedback. That’s very different from using sarcasm or “just joking” comments to make a point, that is, “Oh, are you on the 8:23 a.m. to 4 p.m. shift now?”

Now…how about some constructive feedback for you?
If you’re serious about improving your feedback skills, give this article to your team members. Ask them to check off any “Don’ts” that you’ve made regarding providing feedback. It could be an eye opener.

By following up and asking for feedback about your performance, you:

Get a reality check
Show your employees you really do care about them
Let your employees know that what their input is important to you
Show you’re humble enough to hear feedback
Increase the odds that people will accept your feedback
Create a more engaged and motivated team
OK, now go get and give that feedback!

Friday, February 19, 2010

Monday, February 8, 2010

Happy New Year !!

Hi All,

Wishing you a Happy & Prosperous New Year !!!


(photo from simplychic.com.my)